Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Judiciary

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Judiciary

    Burns is facing up to 12 weeks for the high shot on Kennedy and four weeks for the tackle on Masoe

    Inglis could miss up to five matches - LOL @ $ouff$

  • #2
    12 weeks? He didn't kill him.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by John View Post
      12 weeks? He didn't kill him.
      Jim Comans is back?

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by chook 56 View Post
        Jim Comans is back?
        I suspect Burns will be told "if you ever appear in front of the judiciary again, Football will be a memory for you."

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by pelli69 View Post
          Burns is facing up to 12 weeks for the high shot on Kennedy and four weeks for the tackle on Masoe

          Inglis could miss up to five matches - LOL @ $ouff$
          If that's true about Inglis then a very big LOL@Souffs!

          Comment


          • #6
            None of the above will happen, Burns will get two weeks and Ingliss one week, see how wrong I am

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by mightyrooster View Post
              If that's true about Inglis then a very big LOL@Souffs!
              its true 4 for an early plea 5 if he fights and loses
              I bet the fight it and get it down graded or get off

              Comment


              • #8
                since inglis is qld player he wont get a big penalty, dont want the qlders to think were picking on them?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by stephenj View Post
                  since inglis is qld player he wont get a big penalty, dont want the qlders to think were picking on them?
                  Maybe they can actually point out to Inglis that he isn't a QLDer?


                  LOL@$ouff$

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Both will be downgraded, Inglis 2 weeks and burns 8 weeks. Judiciary are made up of ex players, they usually see it from the players point of view.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by TDK View Post
                      Both will be downgraded, Inglis 2 weeks and burns 8 weeks. Judiciary are made up of ex players, they usually see it from the players point of view.
                      I dont reckon there'll be any downgrading. Seems like they want to send out a strong message.
                      Originally posted by turk-283
                      Kurt 79 - Kags 0..

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Burns should not be down graded he gets a 4 week discount if he just pleads guilty to both. Absolute grub he told Kennedy to "run at me dog" then acted like a complete grub and tried to rip Kennedy's head off, broke his nose in the process. Completely deliberate act proven by the fact the two had words not long before the tackle.

                        Souths will whinge bitch and Moan and blame everyone including young , price and the judiciary in order to get down graded and it will work because it is Inglis. If it were JWH there is not a chance in hell it would be down graded.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          The vermin are blowing up and squealing delux lol. Have even put out a statement that the judiciary was prejudiced by comments by Steve Price. Cop it sweet you scum bags. The self professed pride of the league wants to be treated above everyone else. The saddest day in league is the day they let the toothless vermin troglodytes back in the competition. Luke suspended, inglis today ,burgess next the filthy cards are about to come crumbling down and I'll be the first to dance on their ruins. Lol . Inglis has tackled that way in the past month, he hit Hoffman in a similar way and tried the same on minichello last week. I have been getting texts form vermin supporters claiming they are victimised. Lol forever laughing in their toothless faces. I wonder if the phone chucker will be tweeting or up adding to his book of fools.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            If we said the judiciary are being influenced by an opposition coach I bet we would get in trouble for suggesting such a thing

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Easts4Life View Post
                              If we said the judiciary are being influenced by an opposition coach I bet we would get in trouble for suggesting such a thing
                              Totally agree Easts4life. The vermin are suggesting that the judiciary are not independent and have been influenced. Nothing will happen to the scum but if it was anyone else they would cop fines.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X