Official Match Day Thread: Roosters v Knights

[mightyrooster]

haha, ks has a winning way about him. no doubt he's faux omniscient, condescending and supercilious but he's just different. block him if he offends you.
called me a communist once and i told him i was an anti-communist and his reply suggested he didn't care what sort of a communist i was.
there's a difference between saying someone 'presents' something dishonestly and saying that they 'are' dishonest. and yeah, how can you be defamed when you haven't been identified? to take legal action you'd have to go public. big fella, don't make threats that you're not going to carry out

Yes I agree. Honestly I like him. But at times he can be over zealous and condescending. We should all strive to be tolerant of difference and others opinions. I do my best but sometimes when you’ve copped another put down it’s only human to get a bit annoyed. I’m not intending to be part of a pile in as I hate that.

[mattyh]

crybully

someone who intimidates or harasses others while claiming to be a victim of ill treatment.

Mate , nailed it .

Guy accuses people of supporting other teams .

Claims he is some holier then thou supporter who takes a contrasting point of view, yet one look at his historical posts proves what a total fake he is .

[Inflictor]

Mate , nailed it .

Guy accuses people of supporting other teams .

Claims he is some holier then thou supporter who takes a contrasting point of view, yet one look at his historical posts proves what a total fake he is .

And has to slip in that he is watching the game from one of his country properties and thinks he has the power to close sites down. Who fkn says shit like that? What a complete douche.

FFS

[caz]

Yes I agree. Honestly I like him. But at times he can be over zealous and condescending. We should all strive to be tolerant of difference and others opinions. I do my best but sometimes when you’ve copped another put down it’s only human to get a bit annoyed. I’m not intending to be part of a pile in as I hate that.

he's a character. maybe he'd do best to sack himself as the (admittedly self-appointed) town crier and tone it all down a bit

[milanja]

Can’t believe there is so much talk about Wong try?! It is deadset downward pressure and grounded deliberately with the forearm. You see Siua attempting to grab it with his hands in the build up, in a split second realising that would likely not grip it properly and knock it on, so he switches to using his forearm to just ground the ball. Was really savvy and clever from him and he deserved the try as a result. No way was it a no try, talk about salty.

where is the negative talk?( Is it on x or facebook? I have neither) I watched the Sunday footy show and all three(Freddy,Johns and Lockyer) had no issue with it, and this eliminated any talk of an almost certain penalty try had the try not been awarded.

[nayfo]

Look at the pile on for the King! What brave warriors we have who frequent this site. Always safety in numbers.

Cmon Jack. Have you actually read his posts? If we are all brave warriors for having an opinion and calling him out on what he posts than that would make him the emperor as he is more of a keyboard warrior than everyone on this forum.

I respect your opinion and your contributions on here and to be honest I respect KS when he isn’t arguing with everyone he doesn’t agree with but on this one I don’t agree with your views.

But that’s the great thing about having an opinion, it’s just that!

[Jacks Fur Coat]

Cmon Jack. Have you actually read his posts? If we are all brave warriors for having an opinion and calling him out on what he posts than that would make him the emperor as he is more of a keyboard warrior than everyone on this forum.

I respect your opinion and your contributions on here and to be honest I respect KS when he isn’t arguing with everyone he doesn’t agree with but on this one I don’t agree with your views.

But that’s the great thing about having an opinion, it’s just that!

No worries mate, I respect what you have said. Not necessarily agree 100%, but respect

[Rooster_6]

Legal Matters
/
mmm talking about shovels keep digging - continually calling me dishonest does have legal ramifications - it is defamatory and a harm to my reputation under current NSW Law and as a Public Sector Employee - ICAC legislation and enquiries use the term dishonest - i.e A Public Official dishonestly exercised their official function ( Public Officials engaging in conduct that is not truthful, ethical, or impartial, often for personal gain or to the detriment of others)

I request you apologise and "cease and desist" in using such a term when responding to any of my posts.

This is rich coming from someone who has consistently tried to call out posters for being dishonest about the club they support.

Unfortunately for you we do not live in a communist country and Australia still has laws protecting freedom of speech. The freedom to express one's opinion is protected under the "defence of honest opinion", you can find reference of this in the Defamation ACT 2005, Section 31.

You will receive no apology from me and if you continue to post stats in what I believe is a dishonest and misleading manner then I will continue to provide my opinion on that. Should you not wish to read those posts calling you out for your cherry picking of stats then I would recommend you use the ignore function on the forum so that you do not have to read my posts.

[HunchoRooster]

where is the negative talk?( Is it on x or facebook? I have neither) I watched the Sunday footy show and all three(Freddy,Johns and Lockyer) had no issue with it, and this eliminated any talk of an almost certain penalty try had the try not been awarded.

Largely social media. Fans of other clubs perpetuating a myth that we are somehow protected by the refs.

Also AOB himself in the press conference after the game. Sour grapes!

[King Salvo]

I’m sure another litigious poster threatened legal action recently. Now who was that, I can’t recall?

There was also one not so long ago that implied a threat of violence against another member; scary stuff indeed.

The Chookpen has become a tough place to just be a Roosters fan.

Tough for you more like it.

Cue Ball Head I won't cop my Wife being ridiculed on here at all by anyone ever – the site moderators didn't act, so I took it into my own hands to react to these derogatory comments as any decent husband would do. What was wrong with that? And mmm, you were banned, though, which you conveniently overlook, so tell us all why you were banned? - I know, and so does our legal advisors.

[King Salvo]

This is rich coming from someone who has consistently tried to call out posters for being dishonest about the club they support.

Unfortunately for you we do not live in a communist country and Australia still has laws protecting freedom of speech. The freedom to express one's opinion is protected under the "defence of honest opinion", you can find reference of this in the Defamation ACT 2005, Section 31.

You will receive no apology from me and if you continue to post stats in what I believe is a dishonest and misleading manner then I will continue to provide my opinion on that. Should you not wish to read those posts calling you out for your cherry picking of stats then I would recommend you use the ignore function on the forum so that you do not have to read my posts.

In my opinion, you are clueless about the law then, as you stated that I was dishonest and that was not just an opinion in the way you wrote it. I have taken copies of this - you realise I have law quals - mmm in my opinion, you are clueless about the game of Rugby League as well.

I did warn you a number of times to cease and desist from calling me dishonest, which is defamatory, but you have again - so please provide the full name/address/email of the owner of this site, as this will now need to be dealt with legally.

Sites like this are not above the law and are required to have a system in place where complaints are dealt with independently. This site totally lacks this.

You say you won't ever apologise for any defamatory and insulting remarks you say about other posters, including me – saying it's the opinion - mmm is Dennis Denuto, your lawyer." It's the Vibe."

I ask, and a number of others have too , why you could be both a moderator/administrator and a poster – it is a conflict of interest which needs to be addressed by the site owner from day 1 as you cannot be both.

[SamKerrSimp]

Sites

I am still waiting for you to apologise for calling me "anti-semite which is well known" when I have made no such comments at any point on this website.

You called me a well known anti-semite which is an outright lie and that makes you a dishonest person and your reputation on this website is now known as one of a dishonest person who makes up lies to defame and harm the reputation of people that you don't like who conveniently hold differing political views to yourself. This is now established by your actions and words alone and this is not the first time you have harmed and defamed my reputation on this website with outright lies and verbal attacks that appear to be motivated by a conflicting political viewpoint between the two of us.

I would also like to draw attention to the fact that you called me a dope which is considered a derogative and insulting remark in common Australian colloquialism.

[nayfo]

Why are we still putting up with this bloke?
He has spent the last few hours on this site using derogatory remarks against posters calling them Cueball head, tosser, wanker etc and then complains about being called dishonest and now wants the site owner’s personal information.

Other posters have been banned for less.

[Inflictor]

The question is why would anyone spend literally hours of their life writing absolute BS comments about anything but footy at all hours on a Roosters website that nobody reads. Seriously someone needs to get a life. I think even your wife would call you an idiot.
Another thread gone way off topic by the same goose. Is goose defamatory?

FFS

[007]

In my opinion, you are clueless about the law then, as you stated that I was dishonest and that was not just an opinion in the way you wrote it. I have taken copies of this - you realise I have law quals - mmm in my opinion, you are clueless about the game of Rugby League as well.

I did warn you a number of times to cease and desist from calling me dishonest, which is defamatory, but you have again - so please provide the full name/address/email of the owner of this site, as this will now need to be dealt with legally.

Sites like this are not above the law and are required to have a system in place where complaints are dealt with independently. This site totally lacks this.

You say you won't ever apologise for any defamatory and insulting remarks you say about other posters, including me – saying it's the opinion - mmm is Dennis Denuto, your lawyer." It's the Vibe."

I ask, and a number of others have too , why you could be both a moderator/administrator and a poster – it is a conflict of interest which needs to be addressed by the site owner from day 1 as you cannot be both.

Thanks for the laugh. Funniest thing I've ever read on the Chookpen.

Maybe King Salvo just got out of the wrong side of the bed this morning?

The McEnroe Home - Not the Nine O'Clock News - YouTube