Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Billy Smith's try saver

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Carlos Parra View Post

    So you put it down to health issues (as her excuse) rather than her being a tad over exuberant?

    Fair enough. That's your opinion and it's as valid as mine.
    I'm not putting it down to anything. Don't put words in my mouth. Simply explaining there are more explanations than your insinuation and giving you another possible explanation to try close the gap if it was ignorance.

    But given you've doubled down on it then stand on that hill. I think it's a comment befitting someone of low moral integrity.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post

      I'm not putting it down to anything. Don't put words in my mouth. Simply explaining there are more explanations than your insinuation and giving you another possible explanation to try close the gap if it was ignorance.

      But given you've doubled down on it then stand on that hill. I think it's a comment befitting someone of low moral integrity.
      Yes you are.

      You said "There are plenty of health conditions that can be mistaken for your what you're insinuating"

      So yes, like he said, you are putting it down to a health issue. You are a bit of a nutjob mate, with your absurd word salads that mean absolutely nothing.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post

        I'm not putting it down to anything. Don't put words in my mouth. Simply explaining there are more explanations than your insinuation and giving you another possible explanation to try close the gap if it was ignorance.

        But given you've doubled down on it then stand on that hill. I think it's a comment befitting someone of low moral integrity.
        You said: "There are plenty of health conditions that can be mistaken for your what you're insinuating". So the truth is that you are also insinuating something tied to her health - it's undeniable. If that wasn't your intention, you could just as easily have said "The woman clearly loves her son and having her face on tv. She was in high spirits and very exuberant".

        Like I keep saying, each of our opinions are equally valid. I apologise if mine upset your delicate sensibilities. I'm doubling down, because I'm right and you're wrong with respect to how you're trying to frame it.

        Let's hope that you are as assiduous with your responses to every other poster who comments about any other individual, irrespective of whether or not they are connected to Easts or an enemy team.
        1985: 1 try vs Parramatta, 1 try vs Manly, 1 try vs Wests, 2 tries vs Souffs
        1986: 2 tries vs Illawarra, 1 try vs Balmain, 2 tries vs Norths.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Batemans Bay Rooster View Post

          Yes you are.

          You said "There are plenty of health conditions that can be mistaken for your what you're insinuating"

          So yes, like he said, you are putting it down to a health issue. You are a bit of a nutjob mate, with your absurd word salads that mean absolutely nothing.
          The important term used in my statement is "can be".

          "Can" meaning the possibility of.

          The possibility of is not an insinuation. It's just that an alternative possibility.

          Apologies for the big words.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Carlos Parra View Post

            You said: "There are plenty of health conditions that can be mistaken for your what you're insinuating". So the truth is that you are also insinuating something tied to her health - it's undeniable. If that wasn't your intention, you could just as easily have said "The woman clearly loves her son and having her face on tv. She was in high spirits and very exuberant".

            Like I keep saying, each of our opinions are equally valid. I apologise if mine upset your delicate sensibilities. I'm doubling down, because I'm right and you're wrong with respect to how you're trying to frame it.

            Let's hope that you are as assiduous with your responses to every other poster who comments about any other individual, irrespective of whether or not they are connected to Easts or an enemy team.
            As I already explained to Bateman's the term "can be" is an expression of possibility, not an expression of likelihood so therefore it is not an insinuation.

            I'll be honest I don't know you and don't remember many of your posts and I don't mean that in a demeaning way I just assure you that it is nothing personal and I would've responded the same way to whoever wrote that statement.

            Post a tasteless statement like that about anyone's mother and I'll call it out. If that makes me delicate then put a hibiscus flower in my hair, give me a strawberry daiquiri and I'll still tell you you're a twat for making a comment like that.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post

              The important term used in my statement is "can be".

              "Can" meaning the possibility of.

              The possibility of is not an insinuation. It's just that an alternative possibility.

              Apologies for the big words.
              Your so-called 'big words' don't need to be apologised for. I realise it's can be a struggle.

              Are you saying that if I had said something along the lines of : "She obviously likes the tv which can possibly be put down to her being medicated for a health issue" would have been more appropriate?

              Such a comment is essentially the same as saying/asking "is she on something".

              Perhaps not as delicate, but the imputation is the same.
              1985: 1 try vs Parramatta, 1 try vs Manly, 1 try vs Wests, 2 tries vs Souffs
              1986: 2 tries vs Illawarra, 1 try vs Balmain, 2 tries vs Norths.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post

                As I already explained to Bateman's the term "can be" is an expression of possibility, not an expression of likelihood so therefore it is not an insinuation.

                I'll be honest I don't know you and don't remember many of your posts and I don't mean that in a demeaning way I just assure you that it is nothing personal and I would've responded the same way to whoever wrote that statement.

                Post a tasteless statement like that about anyone's mother and I'll call it out. If that makes me delicate then put a hibiscus flower in my hair, give me a strawberry daiquiri and I'll still tell you you're a twat for making a comment like that.
                WRONG!

                Can I go to the beach, dad?

                Yes you can go to the beach, but I'm not going to allow it!

                Calling me a twat and someone of low moral integrity is far more classless and unnecessary than the observation I made - particularly when you don't know or remember me.

                Hoist on your own petard I think.
                Last edited by Carlos Parra; 05-03-2025, 07:01 PM.
                1985: 1 try vs Parramatta, 1 try vs Manly, 1 try vs Wests, 2 tries vs Souffs
                1986: 2 tries vs Illawarra, 1 try vs Balmain, 2 tries vs Norths.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Carlos Parra View Post

                  Your so-called 'big words' don't need to be apologised for. I realise it's can be a struggle.

                  Are you saying that if I had said something along the lines of : "She obviously likes the tv which can possibly be put down to her being medicated for a health issue" would have been more appropriate?

                  Such a comment is essentially the same as saying/asking "is she on something".

                  Perhaps not as delicate, but the imputation is the same.
                  No it's still a very weird and odd thing to put out on the internet.

                  Why do you care so much about Billy Smith's mum?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    What did i miss? We talking the interview with Locky? His mother was proud , excited, and has charisma to boot.

                    Best part of Billys game is his positional play and strong defence -which isnt easy as a centre. Farked if i know how he didn't chuck it in after all those injuries- but im glad he didn't!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Carlos Parra View Post

                      WRONG!

                      Can I go to the beach, dad?

                      Yes you can go to the beach, but I'm not going to allow it!
                      In both examples can expressing the possibility of going to the beach.



                      I give up.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Random Rooster View Post
                        What did i miss? We talking the interview with Locky? His mother was proud , excited, and has charisma to boot.

                        Best part of Billys game is his positional play and strong defence -which isnt easy as a centre. Farked if i know how he didn't chuck it in after all those injuries- but im glad he didn't!
                        Can only imagine how proud a Mum would be after all Billy Smith has had to endure.

                        It's noticeable that Toops feels more comfortable holding his wing with Smith inside him. He seems to cover ground and close space so quickly in defence.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I saw the video. She looked fine. Probably had a few wines but seemed happy for Billy and was having a great time. Billy looks like an Avengers character with his physique. He has a private school education and is having his best run in the NRL. Why the negativity?

                          His try saver is the best Ive seen since Mini's spectacular try saving strip.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Rooster_6 View Post

                            Can only imagine how proud a Mum would be after all Billy Smith has had to endure.

                            It's noticeable that Toops feels more comfortable holding his wing with Smith inside him. He seems to cover ground and close space so quickly in defence.
                            Centre is the hardest position to play in defence. Billy Smith is a natural centre and gets his decisions more right than wrong. He is aggressive too. A bit of Josh Morris about him

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Barron's Dream View Post
                              I saw the video. She looked fine. Probably had a few wines but seemed happy for Billy and was having a great time. Billy looks like an Avengers character with his physique. He has a private school education and is having his best run in the NRL. Why the negativity?

                              His try saver is the best Ive seen since Mini's spectacular try saving strip.
                              No mate she just has a great personality.

                              Yeah Billy really does everything at pace when defending. A change of luck with injuries and he could be a smokey for the NSW SOO team

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                WATCH: 'Princess Kate' steals the show with wholesome mother moment during son's interview
                                Nothing wrong just a bit of exuberance and nerves.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X