Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Video refs are rubbish

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Geohood View Post
    I was under the impression that as soon as it touches the opposition player mid air and you lose it for a split second, it's a knock on.
    Looking at it again it depends on the angle you are viewing.

    From behind it looks like he may have bobbled into Williams before the balls knocked out. From the front angle it looks like he caught it cleanly and it is then knocked from his grasp, which he recovers cleanly and scores from.

    As PTB said I can see why people think it's a no try. I can also see why it was given.

    I will also stand by my earlier opinion that this incident is a 50/50 call, The one in our game was just wrong, hence the drama after the event.

    That said if we got disallowed that try, the Boggs one, I'd have blown up, if we got given it I'd have praised the Vidiot.



    The FlogPen .

    You know it makes sense.

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Ghost of Finch View Post
      Dean Young scored like this against us in the 2010 GF, except his was way worse.

      At least there could be SOME case made for an attempted strip/batting the ball away in the Dogs-Sharks game.
      You've probably answered Geos question there.

      The one last night looked to me like the ball was batted at on purpose and regathered cleanly, similar to the one we got given vs the Tigpies in that semi in 2010, Bwaiff from memory. The purpose in both those incidents were to batt/rake the ball out, not to make a tackle necessarily.

      The Dean Young one in the GF is a loose carry, the tackles being made and the ball dislodged and hits the defender before it's regathered. The express purpose isn't to knock the ball out, it's to make a tackle, the ball dislodged as the tackles being made.

      Does this make some sense Geo??? Would be easier to show you with a footy, lol.



      The FlogPen .

      You know it makes sense.

      Comment


      • #48
        Bump...

        Another joke of a decision tonight, an absolute discrace.

        These guys are a farkin joke.
        Originally posted by turk-283
        Kurt 79 - Kags 0..

        Comment


        • #49
          The game would be better off without them
          It just gets worse

          Comment


          • #50
            We should put cameras in the video ref box and make them justify their decisions on the spot... then we can see what goes on in their brains.

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Geohood View Post
              We should put cameras in the video ref box and make them justify their decisions on the spot... then we can see what goes on in their brains.
              Based on many decisions the vidiots have made this year they don't have any brains

              Comment


              • #52
                A video ref for a video ref.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Cecchin didn't need to go to the video ref. He was right in front of inglis.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    It's called "passing the buck".
                    Pauline Robinson from the "Wall".

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      This off Facebook..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X