Bunker get's it wrong once again. Re - Manu No Try

[Bates]

If you can’t admit that Penrith dominated that game then you are a bigger idiot than I thought.

I'm all ears when you're ready to apologies.

[Andrew Walker]

If you can’t admit that Penrith dominated that game then you are a bigger idiot than I thought.

They controlled the game with field position Did the score flatter us probably so The flip side being we did very well with all that field position they had to not concede 40

[Qld Chook]

At least Annesley the muppet admitted this one unlike the Turbo interference on Teddy when we played Manly.

Penrith outplayed us but at the end of the day we only lost by 6. That try levels it out and could've changed the whole context of the game. Imagine it was a 14-12 scoreline at half time after us having no field possession, complete game changer that call.

[Qld Chook]

Even though many people will see Sitili's try as a square up, panthers too good, and all the other cliches, the timing of the disallowed try was terrible. If we were down only 6 points at the 25th-minute it is a different ball game.

I thought Sitili's was a fair try. One hand separates whilst the other grounds it.

[Bates]

I thought Sitili's was a fair try. One hand separates whilst the other grounds it.

Left hand grounds the ball.

[Chook2]

If you can’t admit that Penrith dominated that game then you are a bigger idiot than I thought.

Agree Penrith did dominate the whole game
our defence at times was actually okay considering with them scoring two off kicks and two of bad reads on our left edge
It’s more that we got completely dominated but still could have won is the crazy part! And potentially should have if sanity prevailed with the bunker
as the riff would know it’s an 80 min game

[Thirteen]

I'm all ears when you're ready to apologies.

Sorry. But if you couldn’t see the domination last night you were watching through red, white and blue goggles.

[BEC]

Totally agree mate.

I’m not upset with this one as Penrith were by far the superior side last night,always in control of the game..

Sometimes the better team, or the team that plays better doesn't win. If not for the (intentionally???) incorrect calls we had the chance to put a subpar performance in the win column. Would have been nice...

[Bates]

Agree Penrith did dominate the whole game
our defence at times was actually okay considering with them scoring two off kicks and two of bad reads on our left edge
It’s more that we got completely dominated but still could have won is the crazy part! And potentially should have if sanity prevailed with the bunker
as the riff would know it’s an 80 min game

With 3 line breaks each, where is the dominance? The only stat that they significantly dominated in was the penalty count. R 4 P 9

[milanja]

With 3 line breaks each, where is the dominance? The only stat that they significantly dominated in was the penalty count. R 4 P 9

I thought we won the penalty count 9-4?

[bondi paul]

The significant underlying factor on the no try ruling by Butler in the Box and his appointment to the game after Cleary not being named pandered to the riff punt rats just like Butlers performance as ref on the SCG against the Broncos. The fix was on that day and the professional gambler knew it.

[Bates]

I thought we won the penalty count 9-4?

Hey mate pretty sure they won the penalty count.

[Thirteen]

With 3 line breaks each, where is the dominance? The only stat that they significantly dominated in was the penalty count. R 4 P 9

Robbo says “we were well beaten” twice in the first 30 seconds of the presser.

He also says, “In the end they were a better team by far.”

But that’s okay, you keep telling yourself we weren’t dominated.

[milanja]

Hey mate pretty sure they won the penalty count.

It says penalties conceded- panthers 9,

I assume that means they gave them away.

[Batemans Bay Rooster]

I agree with Bates. How can they get it so wrong? What training are they given? You'd imagine it's extensive and ongoing.

The problem with this is it's not as if the call was a 50/50 call where one person saw one thing and someone else saw something else. Like Sitili's try for example. I reckon he bobbled it, but you could go either way on that call and neither side of the argument can be sure they're right.

This was not that. The 2 opinions from the 2 sets of officials, Bunker and then Annesley, are polar opposite interpretations of the same event. That's the issue