nrlw v cowgirls

[zac]

baxter
parker
fressard
kelly
bentley
aiken
kelleher

boyle
davis
fotu-moala
pule
kernick
joseph

scutt
hamilton
hill-moana
morris

[zac]

kelly and boyle no certainties but it's still a strong team. they'll know when they take the field if they're a chance to win the minor premiership but even a loss is unlikely to knock them to 4th and a game in the first week v knights.
scutt's the trainer and named cos we're short a few.
given we can't really rest players probably best to just go for a good performance and set us up for the finals

[NorfolkStreetKid]

I really think the NRLW should have their own section of the forum.
It will obviously be a growing competition which will encourage more discussion over the coming years
so rather than NRLW posts getting lost amongst the mainly Roosters NRL posts on this forum
they should have their own Roosters NRLW forum
Like the Roosters Lower Grades
and the General Pugby League Discussion
and the Off topic discussion have.
Would that be too hard to set up?

[zac]

I really think the NRLW should have their own section of the forum.
It will obviously be a growing competition which will encourage more discussion over the coming years
so rather than NRLW posts getting lost amongst the mainly Roosters NRL posts on this forum
they should have their own Roosters NRLW forum
Like the Roosters Lower Grades
and the General Pugby League Discussion
and the Off topic discussion have.
Would that be too hard to set up?

personally i don't care where threads on the nrlw are posted.
you're post doesn't make sense - you're worried about nrlw theads not getting good air space but you don't want them in the main section

[Jacks Fur Coat]

I really think the NRLW should have their own section of the forum.
It will obviously be a growing competition which will encourage more discussion over the coming years
so rather than NRLW posts getting lost amongst the mainly Roosters NRL posts on this forum
they should have their own Roosters NRLW forum
Like the Roosters Lower Grades
and the General Pugby League Discussion
and the Off topic discussion have.
Would that be too hard to set up?

Not hard to set up, but also not a great idea. No one reads those other sections much, so better to have it all in the one area. IMHO.

[Dr. Voodoo Man]

What is this shit?

[Dr. Voodoo Man]

Not hard to set up, but also not a great idea. No one reads those other sections much, so better to have it all in the one area. IMHO.

Just like your posts Simple Jaxx. Pray for Trump.

[Dr. Voodoo Man]

The woman's game is shit. A joke. A political agenda. They can't play and are ugly to boot. PASS. All part of the NRL's agenda to be seen as woke.

[NorfolkStreetKid]

Not hard to set up, but also not a great idea. No one reads those other sections much, so better to have it all in the one area. IMHO.

I would suggest that anyone who was interested in it would definitely read it if this site had a forum dedicated to NRLW Roosters.

[NorfolkStreetKid]

personally i don't care where threads on the nrlw are posted.
you're post doesn't make sense - you're worried about nrlw theads not getting good air space but you don't want them in the main section

I am not worried about anything...... I just think they deserve their own section.
what part of that doesn't make sense?

[Dr. Voodoo Man]

Actually saw a bit of coverage of the woman's game last weekend. They kept featuring that chick that banged Adam Elliot in a public toilet as some kind of star. It felt like some kind of bogan fantasy. Putrid.

[Jacks Fur Coat]

The woman's game is shit. A joke. A political agenda. They can't play and are ugly to boot. PASS. All part of the NRL's agenda to be seen as woke.

Hmmm...weren't you recently complaining about someone whose behaviour you labelled misogynistic?

The above sounds a trifle...

[mightyrooster]

The woman's game is shit. A joke. A political agenda. They can't play and are ugly to boot. PASS. All part of the NRL's agenda to be seen as woke.

Are you being sarcastic? Just asking because I’m a bit confused after our chat a few weeks ago.

[Dr. Voodoo Man]

Are you being sarcastic? Just asking because I’m a bit confused after our chat a few weeks ago.

The ugly part maybe but not the rest. They can't play and are boring.

[mightyrooster]

The ugly part maybe but not the rest. They can't play and are boring.

Ok, well I must have got the wrong end of the stick because I was thinking you were suggesting Thirteen’s similar thoughts on the NRLW was the reason why you labeled him a misogynist. So there’s a different reason then.