Tweet
Apparently this Saturday will be the first ever NRL match with 2 referees. What do you think about that? I think it is good because at some points last year, I thought the referee was struggling especially on the front of not noticing things that should've been on report.
-
7Yes42.86%3No, one referee is enough28.57%2Only for finals0.00%0Not sure28.57%2 -
2 refs were used in the trial in perth, also in other trials last weekend
Delecto Oriens est odio Meridianus
To love Easts is to hate Souffs
Originally posted by Bill Shankley, Liverpool FCOriginally posted by Andy Raymond Commentating Souffs V Manly 18/04/09 -
I'd prefer not to make a judgment on this until I have seen it's effectiveness (or maybe non effectiveness?).
I've read an article by Phil Gould a couple of weeks ago that made some good points against it, but like I said I'd prefer to see it in action first...Comment
-
Bad news BuddyOriginally posted by nicktherooster View Post
The number of qualified referees on the field during games last year was three as the touch judges are also qualified. the number officiating per game last year varied between 4 or 5 as the video referee is also qualified!!
So we are now about to add another referee to this mix so I'm not sure we are progressing
Spanner gone and never forgottenComment
-
I cant see what difference it will make. I just think its useless.
Egos out of control again, but it what we get when ex-reffs hold crucial decision making positions in the NewsRL org.
Sadly like with EVERY rule theyve changed/altered we just have to suck it up.
And the coaches will find a new way to exploit it, they always do.
The FlogPen .
You know it makes sense.Comment
Comment