Sharks, a great team but can't play without Carney

[Guest]

Ok, its half time in the Monday night game at ANZ between Sharks and Bulldogs. Bulldogs are up 24-0, and Sharks have looked lousy in attack. THis is mainly to do with their halves. Jeff Robson is a great talent at halfback for the Sharks. But seing Carney is out at Origin, Robson is forced to play outside Wade Graham (predictable and definitely not a halfback). Even the commentators on 104.9 agree. "Robson is a great player, but he's playing outside Graham who is not used to playing five-eighth"

Now you may be asking why I have posted this on the Sydney Roosters discussion. But the answer is simple. The Roosters have had the same problem as the Sharks are having tonight, for the past year. We dont have a good five-eighth to play outside the great talent Pearce, or Smith doesnt pick a good five-eigth. No, instead he picks an absolute shocker of a five-eighth, maybe the worst in the competition.

This problem can be fixed by 2 options.
1. Anasta to lock, mortimer to five eighth
2. Anasta to Newtown, mortimer to five eigth

If these options arent picked, we will have to wait for next year with Maloney and Pearce.

[Guest]

Sharks, a two man team that can't play without Carney

Fixed the title for you

[BUDDY]

Goes to show the big mistake we made.

Whoever chose Anasta over Carney should be hung by their balls.

[Guest]

Goes to show the big mistake we made.

Whoever chose Anasta over Carney should be hung by their balls.

Smith

[Guest]

and on and on and on and on and on and......

Give it a rest FFS!!

[Guest]

A bit like us

[Andrew Walker]

Sharks, a two man team that can't play without Carney

Fixed the title for you

No The title is right The other playerw as missing last week and thery beat Storm

Cant bel;ieve we let Craney go We would be GF contenders this year with him

[Guest]

No The title is right The other playerw as missing last week and thery beat Storm

Cant bel;ieve we let Craney go We would be GF contenders this year with him

Not based on the way he played with us last year. What exactly makes you think he would have changed his form if he was still with us?

The new start has revived him - good for the Sharks. It has nothing to do with us.

BTW, sounds exactly like 2010. That means the Sharks 2011 is yet to come.

[milanja]

We would also be contenders with freddy,lockyer,foran, campese, thurston. whats the point of this??

[Andrew Walker]

The point is None of the above you have mentioned was actually contracted to play for us this year

[BUDDY]

We would also be contenders with freddy,lockyer,foran, campese, thurston. whats the point of this??

We didn't have any of those under contract. We chose to extend Anasta instead.

EDIT: Snap Andy

[milanja]

My point is, its easy to say if we had so and so we would be this. fact is we dont. its the same as the refs boss saying we should of been awarded with a try yesterday. it didnt happen/we dont have carney. will complaining and moaning about it every week bring it all back?

[Andrew Walker]

Shall I take it you havent complained about yesterdys no try tuling then ?

[milanja]

I have, but i cant see myself complaining about it every week.

[Guest]

Geez bejeezus I miss Todd Carney. We would be growing with confidence with a halves pairing rather than well... half a halves pairing. Yowser!