Storm Named Best, Roosters 9th in Questionable Study.

[Jacks Fur Coat]

Hey Jax, chill a little buddy. You bin comin' through on the burst after that dummy to the right wing for far too long pal. Your game's dead set easy to read and you can't expect not to get a coat hanger occasionally, Switch the angle mate for all our sakes.

Haha...I'm as chilled as a bottle a bubbles on ice mate.

12 posts only laden with hard left politix and you label me as a bit easy to read?

You've come from nowhere swinging like a bar room brawler. We're all on the duck and weave.

[crikey chris]

That bullshit article just abused the meaning of sarcasm!

[Darkone]

Not good enough

We need to step it up, room for improvement

[ism22]

Yep an amateur ice hockey team with the world's worst rink (down in Tuggers - it's awful) that trains once or twice a week then has a game on the weekend is totally on par with us. (Sorry in my books 'semi-professional' = amateur... 2 training sessions a week, a bit of petrol money and drinks at the club after the game <> professional).

Laughable. I know 1/2 the players and their best player is a bong head from Canada who came over for uni. Basically the only reason they've done alright is that the competition's poor and they have a steady flow of Canadian/European uni students playing for them (i.e. mediocre players who grew up with ice hockey v amateurs from a country where literally nobody plays ice hockey aside from a few nerdy fanatics).

In comparison we have a board stacked with multi-millionaires, no player's earning less than $200k a year, we have the world's best player, our juniors have a waterside mansion to live in and we pay $$$ for stack of elite coaches (all elite by world standards) who have put together a full-time training/development program for all ages. The Brave's got nothing.

[Kingbilly]

Holy Smoke just made the 8!

And the panel was Al Gore, Greta Thunberg, Prince Willy and Adam Bandt of the "How Dare You" organisation.

Can't be. That list ezists and therefore is something of substance (right or wrong) and not one of those on your list have or are capable of producing anything of substance.

[ism22]

> Following an analysis of each team's win percentage, ladder performance and stability across 16 different competitions, the Storm came out on top.

Hence why a bunch of 'semi-professional' teams in fringe sports have dominated the list.

The Storm? Well simply put they haven't missed the 8 since they cheated the salary cap. We were what...
- 2nd on the ladder in 2019 (although we won the comp)
- 1st in 2018 (and won the comp)
- 2nd in 2017 (Storm first)
- 15th in 2016 (Storm first)
- 1st in 2015 (Storm fourth)

So basically:
- Storm always make top 4 and have kept their whole team.
- We have had more success despite changing most of our team and importantly, developing heaps of juniors.
- The Storm pretty much won because they never finished outside the top 4... and only only once finished outside the top 2 (despite only 1 premiership). Also, they had more stability in their lineup. Apparently having a good season then choking is better than actually winning the comp + developing a new generation of players. Go figure.

[The Skeez]

Not good enough

We need to step it up, room for improvement

Good point DO.
How else will we win three in a row?

[The Skeez]

Hey Jax, chill a little buddy. You bin comin' through on the burst after that dummy to the right wing for far too long pal. Your game's dead set easy to read and you can't expect not to get a coat hanger occasionally, Switch the angle mate for all our sakes.

The Coat gets hangered

[SupermanSupportsEasts4Eva]

We all know who the world champs are!

[Mad_Rabid_Rooster]

What a load of nonsense! Not worth the paper it is written on, or our time spent on debating it. We know who rules the roost in the NRL.